Current Project: HUD7
| Issue ID# 310 | Wrong or missing version-number being displayed in some issues on this webpage | |
| Status: Completed | Version: 7.5.0-beta.1.3 | Priority: 3 |
| Assigned to: | Submitted by: Miriam Himanez | Attached file: |
| Type: Bug |
Submitted: 19/03/2018 17:30:19 PDT |
Last Update: 11/07/2018 21:20:43 PDT |
|
Description: 1. Please take a look onto the displayed version-numbers of Issues #295 - #307. 2. 3. What should happen: As long as it's about issues sent by me, the displayed beta version-numbers should increase continuously together with the timeline. What actually happens: I've chosen Issue #295 to be the oldest one to look at, because in decembre, when the version-confusion on this webpage began, I remember this one as the oldest report showing a sudden change of the version-number afterwards. Issue #295 shows "7.5.0-beta.1.3", so do #296 and #297 too. Issue #298 (marked to be in progress currently) doesn't show any version-information at all, #299 - #303 not either. Issue #304 has been sent by someone else not using a beta. Issue #305 shows "7.5.0-beta.1.2", so do #306 and #307 too. At least the version-numbers of Issues #298 - #307 (#304 excluded) are wrong, because they're either missing or older than in previous reports. I remember the last version, I've worn in decembre, was "7.5.0-beta.1.7 C". The current version identifies as "7.5.0-beta.1.3" although. I checked Issues #295 and #302 and found the fixes for them still being there, so I conclude, that there doesn't have been just a rollback to the older version. The improvements of the (previous) higher versions are still working, so is it just the version-number itself having changed from 1.7 back to 1.3? |
||
Note ID# 1332:
| User: | Miriam Himanez | Submitted: | 08/07/2018 | ||
|
I noticed the version-numbers having changed again. Now the full versions are affected as well. Oldest report, I checked, was Issue #250. The results are as follows: 250 - 256 = 7.4. 8 292 = beta.1.1 257 - 270 = 7.4.10 295 - 297 = beta.1.2 271 - 273 = 7.4.11 298 - 303 = beta.1.4 274 = 7.4.10 305 - 307 = beta.1.1 275 - 276 = 7.4.11 310 = beta.1.2 277 = 7.4.10 278 - 281 = 7.4.13 282 - 289 = 7.4.15 (7.4.15 was released yesterday!) 290 - 291 = 7.4.12 293 - 294 = 7.4.12 304 = 7.4.13 308 = 7.4.13 309 = 7.4.14 311 = 7.4.14 The inconsistency begins with Issue #274 (full versions) and Issue #305 (betas). |
|||||
Note ID# 1333:
| User: | Miriam Himanez | Submitted: | 08/07/2018 | ||
|
Ops, the formating of the list hasn't been copied properly. I better repost the comment to avoid confusion. I noticed the version-numbers having changed again. Now the full versions are affected as well. Oldest report, I checked, was Issue #250. The results are as follows: 250 - 256 = 7.4.8 257 - 270 = 7.4.10 271 - 273 = 7.4.11 274 = 7.4.10 275 - 276 = 7.4.11 277 = 7.4.10 278 - 281 = 7.4.13 282 - 289 = 7.4.15 (7.4.15 was released just yesterday!) 290 - 291 = 7.4.12 293 - 294 = 7.4.12 304 = 7.4.13 308 = 7.4.13 309 = 7.4.14 311 = 7.4.14 292 = beta.1.1 295 - 297 = beta.1.2 298 - 303 = beta.1.4 305 - 307 = beta.1.1 310 = beta.1.2 The inconsistency begins with Issue #274 (full versions) and Issue #305 (betas). |
|||||
Note ID# 1340:
| User: | Lulu | Submitted: | 11/07/2018 | ||
|
Updated status to In Progress from New. |
|||||
Note ID# 1341:
| User: | Lulu | Submitted: | 11/07/2018 | ||
|
Hi Miriam, Thanks for the bug report. It's fixed now 🙂 |
|||||
Note ID# 1342:
| User: | Lulu | Submitted: | 11/07/2018 | ||
|
Updated status to Completed from In Progress. |
|||||